Sunday, 25 December 2011

Today’s Call: USDCHF – Bearish below .9215

In line with yesterday’s bullish call for sentiment USDCHF saw initial gains, supported by positive momentum. This upside stalled near .9300 and all initial gains were reversed into the close. These losses have been continued in Asia and although intraday signals are approaching oversold extremes we look for this decline to deepen. In view of this our call is bearish below .9215 The immediate objective is .9140, Tuesday’s low, with a move below that point targeting .9117, then last Friday’s bottom at .9075.
The risk to this call is that oversold extremes begin to correct earlier and higher than currently assessed. This would be signalled by a move above .9215 with subsequent upside targeting .9236, then yesterday’s peak at .9277.

source from: tradingfloor

Grain report – bullish!

The U.S. Department of agriculture today released the long awaited report about U.S. farmers’ planting intentions for the 2011/12 crop season.

The total acreage came in slightly higher than expected at 239.4 mio acres, which is 9.4 mio acres more than the 2010/11 season.

The biggest winner, compared with expectations, was wheat and corn while the losers were soybeans and cotton (see table below). The corn acreage will be the second largest since 1944 as strong demand for food and ethanol has reduced world stockpiles. It has outpaced increases for wheat and soybeans as farmers can make more profit per unit of corn compared with the other crops.

The USDA also released first quarter stock levels where both corn and soybeans levels were lower than expected, while wheat was higher.

Despite almost meeting expectations and considering the current tightness in especially corn and soybeans, this report looks bullish for the whole sector as dwindling stock levels means weather developments over the coming months will be absolutely crucial in order to achieve status quo.

The global market will struggle to absorb weather related shocks like the ones we saw in 2010 – in particular the Russian drought and flooding elsewhere.

source from: tradingfloor

Hennes & Mauritz and Wal-Mart feeling pain of rising input costs

As commodity prices continue to surge there’s a pressing yet unanswered question hanging in the air: When will this lead to an aggregate slowdown in companies’ operating margins or an ignition of inflation as retailers attempt to pass on costs to consumers?

Today, Hennes & Mauritz released its first quarter earnings (ending February 28) which showed a decline in sales, primarily related to a surge in the Swedish krona against most export countries’ currencies. More importantly, the company saw a sharp decline in its gross margin; however, this is normal for the company in its first quarter but the decline was the largest since the first quarter of 2009. According to management the effects on gross margin are due to cost inflation in their sourcing markets (primarily Asia) with for example, significantly higher cotton prices, less spare capacity and increased transportation costs due to higher oil prices. Instead of passing on these cost increases to customers, the company has chosen to strengthen its price position. This might prove to be the right tactic, but if margins continue to get hurt shareholders might have a different opinion.

Looking at the chart below, it is very clear that cotton prices are beginning to hurt clothing retailers. Cotton has increased five times since the beginning of 2009 but the main part of that increase has come since summer 2010.

Source: Bloomberg

If you look at Hennes & Mauritz’s gross margin on a quarterly basis it fluctuates quite a bit so it is difficult to analyse the true trend in gross margin. Looking at the trailing twelve months (TTM) gross margin though it is quite clear that the company is experiencing increased pressure on its margins; the gross margin TTM has been falling for three consecutive quarters now, which was unseen during the financial crisis. Interestingly enough, but will the trend continue? We believe it will because it is all about how companies plan their operations – they operate with long-term contracts and not in the spot market.

Source: Bloomberg and own calculations

So why has Hennes & Mauritz’s gross margin not been hit harder? Companies are not planning their operations in the spot market, they sign long-term contracts to hedge and better budget their costs, so most producers of clothing probably had long-term contracts with favourable prices when commodity prices collapsed at the end of 2008. That is why the rising prices in the futures (and spot) markets are slow to filter through the production chain and it also explains why operating margins have spiked at a rate never seen in decades. As these favourable contracts roll-over the new contracts will reflect the rising commodity prices and squeeze Hennes & Mauritz’s and other companies’ gross and operating margins.

Across the pond, Wal-Mart’s CEO Bill Simon expects inflationary impacts in the months ahead on clothing, food and other products. In an interview with USD Today, Simon said “we are seeing cost increases starting to come through at a pretty rapid rate”. It is not only the surge in cotton and other agricultural prices that is hurting retailers; the price of crude oil has also surged since late 2010 pushing transportation and production costs higher. The large retailers have so far been able to insulate consumers from rising commodity prices which are primarily due to companies planning their operations on longer term contracts and not in the spot market; so as these contracts roll over the new and higher prices will filter through the production chain into the shelves of retailers. On an aggregate level, core inflation (excluding food and energy) rose 0.2 percent month-over-month exceeding estimates.

With these indications from Hennes & Mauritz, Wal-Mart and other companies it is only a matter of quarters now before input costs will pose a threat to companies’ profitability and consumers will not remain shielded from these rapidly rising commodity prices. With this in mind, the next couple of earnings seasons will be very interesting to watch.

source from: tradingfloor

Steen’s Chronicle: Price of money rising; when is the bill due?

Stocks had a rough close Monday and, at least in the S&P E-mini, there was a key reversal. But for now, rotation continues into stocks from fixed income, as stocks are seen as a ‘tangible asset’ for many who continue to shun metals as an alternative in their portfolios.

Monday’s price action in the S&P was indeed compromising for an overall positive view on stocks. There is some risk that the move between asset classes is reaching a zenith – volumes are coming down while the fixed income market is at levels which either need to hold or break.

If a Tuesday rally doesn’t materialise (Tuesday tends to be very positive), we may need to readjust our medium-term target of 1385-00 on the S&P. But if there’s no rally, or rates do break lower, it would only pave the way to a repeat of last year’s April/May correction.

But it would be just that - a correction - because all roads still lead to QE3.

Looking at Southern Europe yields is obvious that the present levels are unsustainable over time:

Source: Bloomberg

Meanwhile, the medium- to long-term outlook in the US yields is clearly higher as seen here:

Source: Stockcharts.com

These rate expectations, combined with increased rhetoric from Fed officials on QE exit in June, have moved both yields and inflation expectations:

Source: Bloomberg

Thus, there is ample evidence, both in the market in the form of inflation expectations, and in actual moves by the Fed and ECB, to expect less accommodation going into the summer. The Fed and the ECB look set on preparing the market for normalization. In the case of the Fed, there’s ample evidence of this, including:

  • The announcement of the US Treasury selling its mortgage portfolio
  • The AIG auction – with the ensuing denial to Bank of America paying a dividend
  • Regional Fed governors been all over the press confusing market with almost hawkish talk (Bullard + Evans)
  • A new press policy from Bernanke – indicating need for more communication from Fed in lead in to higher rates

We see this as a massaging of expectations of hikes to come. But to come only if, and that’s and important if, unemployment rates start to move down, disposable incomes rise beyond the negative energy and food prices, and the stock market does holds support at 1250 on the S&P. If Bernanke is able to create an air of normality, compared to today’s crisis management, ahead of the 2012 election, he will have helped himself, his boss, and Geithner.

In the Eurozone it’s a little more straight-forward in communication terms. We have the expected rate hike from the ECB on 7 April. But this is to satisfy the German paymaster, who runs the EU with Iron Hand. There are NO other lenders of last resort left in the EU system.

In summary, central bankers are preparing the markets for normalisation. And yes there are a lot of preconditions, political and practical obstacles before an actual hike. Given the latter, we remain skeptical on policy moves, but bullish on the bond vigilantes’ ability to move longer rates higher and test the long term downtrend in rates.

2011 will truly be a battle of intentions, but we side with the theory/path of marginal cost will rise, and rise more than markets are pricing in.

source from: tradingfloor

If Bill Gross Sees U.S. as Shaky, Check Japan: William Pesek

This question leaps to the mind navigating the ruins of Japanese cities like Tagajo. Skylines now look as if Dali’s surrealist brush had a hand in rendering things so out of place. Escher’s mind seems at work, too. Interlocking shapes that shouldn’t exist in the three-dimensional world litter cityscapes that before March 11’s earthquake and tsunami were pretty run of the mill.

The mess one confronts in the northeast — flattened buildings, fleets of destroyed Toyotas at ports, ships sitting in the middle of streets, the search for bodies — graphically demonstrates whyStandard & Poor’s is so worried about Japan. Concerned about the magnitude of the reconstruction bill, S&P cut Japan’s rating outlook.

So is Japan on the verge of a debt crisis? No, and that may just be the problem.

Rising stocks and bond prices show traders aren’t buying the despair about Japan’s finances. They are focusing on the nation’s $15 trillion of household savings, the government’s latitude to raise taxes and the fact that about 95 percent of public debt is held domestically.

Yet Japan’s day of reckoning will arrive at some point, and the longer it’s delayed, the worse it will be. This is an ideal moment for the bond vigilantes, who from time to time take matters into their own hands and boost yields, to teach Japan a lesson. Nothing of the sort is happening.

Keep Borrowing

On Wednesday, the day S&P threatened to downgrade Japan, credit-default swaps protecting government debt for five years returned to their pre-March 11 trading range. The message to politicians: By all means, continue borrowing with abandon.

It’s not unlike what’s afoot in the U.S. Negativity about America’s budget deficit has investors like Bill Gross, who runs the world’s biggest bond fund at Pacific Investment Management Co., abandoning Treasuries. Bond dealers disagree, as evidenced by the 3.32 percent yield on the 10-year note. Broadly speaking, the bond market doesn’t seem worried about the U.S.

Looked at through this lens, traders are even less perturbed by Japan’s debt load; 10-year yields are a paltry 1.2 percent. One explanation for why markets are ignoring S&P is that credit rating companies, wrong on just about every major crisis of the last 15 years, have lost all credibility inAsia.

Complacent Markets

The more worrisome one is that markets are complacent. It’s hard not to draw this conclusion when you trek around the Sendai region, which was inundated by the tsunami. From my vantage point, the initial $300 billion reconstruction estimates are fanciful. So, too, might be S&P’s suggestion that the price tag would, at the high end, be $613 billion. It may cost far more.

The challenges that held Japan back before the quake are more acute now. The one most evident in the tsunami zone is how an aging and shrinking population symbolizes the decline of economic life in rural areas. The question isn’t just how to rebuild, but whether to even bother in some places.

There’s also the question of when to start. Economic logic tells you to begin right away. After a 1995 quake, the city of Kobe acted fast and vibrant growth followed. Such thinking is callous and borderline immoral to the likes of Shintaro Takegawa.

Takegawa, 57, is a Sendai truck driver whose company lost more than 90 percent of its fleet when the oceans poured into the city center. He was intrigued to see a wandering foreigner in his midst and offered me a ride back to the train station, a few kilometers from Sendai’s main port.

Why the Hurry?

“There is a big hurry to rebuild, but we have to have respect for the dead and the missing — more than 25,000 people,” Takegawa explains. “Why can’t we wait a few months?”

This sentiment is common in Japan’s northeast. I heard it, for example, from police officers in the city of Natori, which was literally wiped off the map last month. My Bloomberg News colleagues who have traveled extensively around Tohoku since March 11 routinely encounter it, too. It underscores the challenges facing a nation anxious to dispatch construction crews.

The nuclear crisis in Fukushima is another wild card. This week, electronics maker Sharp Corp. became the latest company to delay making forecasts for this year, citing difficulty in estimating the financial toll of the last several weeks.

Japan is in bizarre economic territory. Bank of Japan Governor Masaaki Shirakawa isn’t exaggerating when he says the economy faces “strong downward pressure.” That dynamic, coupled with the cost of rebuilding Tohoku, means issuing lots of new debt.

You would think that with Japan’s debt-to-gross domestic product ratio — already 200 percent — set to widen, traders would be wary. You would think a nation with a shrinking population would be chastened by markets for over-borrowing and forced to find another way to boost growth.

No, traders are saying all is well and giving Japan the green light to sell bonds. One can only imagine the market surrealism that will begin once that light turns yellow or, worse, red.

(William Pesek is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

source from: bloomberg

Li Ka-shing’s Hui Xian Hong Kong Yuan IPO Declines on Debut

Trust, Hong Kong’s first stock sale denominated in yuan, fell on its debut after offering the lowest yield among property trusts in the city.

Hui Xian declined as much as 11 percent and ended its first day 9.4 percent lower at 4.75 yuan. The trust raised 10.5 billion yuan ($1.6 billion) selling units at 5.24 yuan each, the low end of its price range.

Backed by an office and retail development in Beijing, the trust has a forecast yield of 4.26 percent compared with an average estimated yield of 4.85 percent for Hong Kong-traded REITS. Hui Xian marked the first time in at least eight years that 82-year-old Li, the city’s richest man, had to settle for the lowest amount sought in an IPO of a property trust.

“One of the trust’s selling point was that you’re also betting on yuan appreciation, but this might’ve turned away some investors because they thought the procedure of exchanging yuan to invest is just too much trouble and complicated,” saidCastor Pang, research director at Cinda International Holdings Ltd. “This adds to the fact that it offers a slightly lower return than most other REITs out there.”

Individuals applied for about 2.2 times the stock reserved for them, according to a statement to the Hong Kong stock exchange yesterday.

The three other REITs backed by Li that sold stock in IPOs since 2003 raised the maximum targeted amount, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Prosperity REIT, Li’s last REIT IPO in Hong Kong, which started trading in December 2005, drew retail orders of 300 times the stock on offer.

Li’s REITs

Underwriters BOC International Holdings Ltd., Citic Securities and HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA)set aside 20 percent of the total offering in Hui Xian for individuals, double the typical retail allotment in Hong Kong IPOs. The decision was driven by expectations that Hui Xian would be popular among retail investors, people familiar with the process said.

“It looks like it won’t be as successful as people thought it would be,” Alex Au, managing director of Richland Capital Management Ltd. in Hong Kong, which oversees $300 million of assets, said before the shares started trading. “Very strong response for the IPO was expected from the retail market, but it turns out it was barely oversubscribed.”

Prosperity REIT (808) now has an indicated yield of 5.91 percent, according to Bloomberg data. Suntec Real Estate Investment Trust and Fortune Real Estate Investment, the REITs Li took public in Singapore in 2003 and 2004, have yields of 6.07 percent and 6.51 percent, respectively, according to Bloomberg data.

Yuan Deposits

Li is seeking to take advantage of China’s efforts to promote international use of its currency and swelling yuan deposits in Hong Kong.

There are about 200 billion yuan of “idle” Chinese- currency deposits in Hong Kong that could flow into the IPO, according to a sales document sent by one of the underwriters before marketing for the stock sale.

“Originally, people thought that if this is successful, there will be more yuan-denominated IPOs in Hong Kong, but if this stock goes below water, then the interest for future yuan- denominated IPOs will be lower,” Au said.

Yuan deposits in Hong Kong may rise to 870 billion yuan by the end of this year, Zhang Guangping, deputy director general of the China Banking Regulatory Commission’s Shanghai branch, said today. The city’s yuan-denominated deposits reached a record $52 billion in February.

Oriental Plaza

Hui Xian, controlled by Li’s Cheung Kong (Holdings) Ltd. and Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. (13), is backed by the Oriental Plaza in Central Beijing. Covering 100,000 square meters (1.1 million square feet), Oriental Plaza consists of eight premium office towers, a shopping mall, a Grand Hyatt Hotel and serviced apartments, according to its website.

“The properties are of good quality in a prime location, but that may not make up for other risk factors,” said Katie Chan, Hong Kong-based analyst at Haitong International Securities Group Ltd. “For example, some investors may think there may be potential exchange rate gain, but the IPO prospectus actually made it clear that dividends may not be paid in yuan.”

Hui Xian’s ownership claim to the assets backing the trust expires in 2049, according to the IPO prospectus.

Li was ranked 11th in Forbes magazine’s annual global rich list last month with an estimated wealth of $26 billion.

source from: bloomberg

Buffett to Face Questions on Praising Sokol Before Audit Report

for misleading the company about stock trades.

Buffett uses his meeting and annual Omaha, Nebraska, press conference to promote Berkshire’s growth, pitch the company as an acquirer to potential takeover targets and tout his emphasis on ethics. The 80-year-old chief executive officer started having journalists screen shareholder inquiries in 2009 and encouraged them to pick the most challenging ones to replace inquires from prior years about baseball and religion.

The departure of David Sokol, 54, in March, after he invested in a firm he pitched as a buyout candidate, raised questions about Buffett’s oversight and succession planning. Sokol, once considered a possible replacement for Buffett as CEO, violated Berkshire’s ethics, the audit committee said April 26, weeks after Buffett praised his “extraordinary” contributions in announcing his resignation.

“Buffett is going to get questions about his own behavior” at tomorrow’s meeting said Lyman Johnson, professor of corporate law at Washington and Lee University School of Law. “I do think that Buffett erred in his initial announcement.”

Buffett oversees the heads of Berkshire’s more than 70 subsidiaries with the help of Vice Chairman Charles Munger, 87, and a staff of about 20 at the company’s headquarters. Berkshire employs more than 250,000 people across industries spanning insurance, energy and consumer goods, and Buffett entrusts operational authority to the CEOs of the individual units.

Governance, Credit

Berkshire is facing “governance challenges” that may hurt the company’s credit quality, Moody’s Investors Service said April 1, citing Sokol’s stock trades and resignation. The Securities and Exchange Commission is probing whether Sokol bought Lubrizol Corp. (LZ) shares on inside information, a person who declined to be identified said on March 31.

Buffett, who disclosed the trades in a March 30 statement announcing Sokol’s departure, praised the manager for his work leading Berkshire’s MidAmerican Energy Holdings, its roofing unit Johns Manville and luxury-flight unit NetJets. “Neither Dave nor I feel his Lubrizol purchases were in any way unlawful,” Buffett said.

“The whole notion of Berkshire Hathaway operating on a higher plane was based upon the idea they didn’t just do what was legal, they did what was ethical,” said Cornelius Hurley, a professor at Boston University School of Law and former assistant general counsel at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. “When one of your senior officers gets caught with his hand in the jar and you say, ‘Oh it’s legal,’ you’ve kind of blown away that principle of higher standards.”

Share Surge

Sokol’s purchase of about $10 million in Lubrizol stock while representing Berkshire in discussions about buying the lubricant maker violated company policies on insider trading, the committee found. Prior to his agreement to buy Lubrizol, Buffett was unaware of the timing of Sokol’s trades and that he was working with Citigroup Inc. (C) bankers to deal with the Wickliffe, Ohio-based company, according to the report. Lubrizol jumped 28 percent on March 14 when Buffett announced the $9 billion deal.

Sokol’s “misleadingly incomplete disclosures to Berkshire Hathaway senior management concerning those purchases violated the duty of candor he owed the company,” the committee said.

Sokol “would not, and did not, trade improperly, nor did he violate any fair reading of the Berkshire Hathaway policies,” according to a statement from William Levine, a lawyer for Sokol at Dickstein Shapiro LLP in Washington.

‘The Great Inquisition’

Buffett, who built the world’s third-biggest personal fortune by boosting Berkshire’s stock price in four decades as CEO, told executives in a 2010 memo that the while the company can withstand financial losses, “We can’t afford to lose reputation — even a shred of reputation.”

Andrew Ross Sorkin, the New York Times writer who is scheduled to be on the panel asking questions, said in an April 5 column that this year’s meeting could be called “The Great Inquisition” because of questions about Sokol rather than the “Woodstock” for capitalism, as it has been called by Buffett.

Buffett was asked at last year’s meeting about Berkshire’s $5 billion investment in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), which was sued by the SEC earlier in 2010 over its disclosures tied to collateralized debt obligations. Buffett praised Goldman Sachs, which settled the suit in July by agreeing to pay $550 million and said it made a mistake by omitting some information from investors.

PetroChina Stake

Shareholders at the 2007 meeting called on Buffett to divest a $3.3 billion stake in PetroChina Co. because its parent company held oil reserves in pipelines in Sudan where the government was accused of supporting genocide. Buffett said at the meeting he had no disagreement with PetroChina’s actions. He sold the stake later that year.

In 2009, when Buffett instituted the new format, Berkshire was recovering from a year in which its shares fell 32 percent. The company’s Class A shares advanced 21 percent in 2010 and 3.6 percent this year through yesterday. Buffett in his annual letter requested shareholder questions and said that he and Munger “know the journalists will pick some tough ones, and that’s the way we like it.”

More than 30,000 people travel from around the world to Omaha for the annual meeting at the Qwest Center, where Buffett and Munger take questions for about five hours. Buffett’s annual press conference is scheduled for May 1.

source from: bloomberg